Some Simple Mates. The first thing a student should do, is to familiarise himself with the power of the pieces. This can best be done by learning how to. I’ve been trying to study with an eBook I got from project Gutenberg. The explanations are generally clear but I don’t have any clue what the. So I found a pdf of Chess Fundamentals by Capablanca but it was in descpritive notation. Does anyone know if there is an algebraic version online because I.

Author: Mutaur Karg
Country: Latvia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 22 June 2014
Pages: 374
PDF File Size: 11.70 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.73 Mb
ISBN: 664-7-30208-111-1
Downloads: 4934
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kigacage

Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Table fkndamentals Contents Chapter I. Moreover, some of the lines given in the analyzed games are not accurate when assessed by the last version of Stockfish.

I wander to whom this book could benefit. Look in the FAQs of this Board to find more. Check out Logical Chess: Planning a Win in the Middle-Game Play How to find out which pawn will be first to queen Don’t ask for advice about games in progress.

Javier rated it it was amazing Mar 27, Chess Fundamentals, Revised The other algebraic edition, which simply replaces the descriptive notation but does not change any alvebraic the text.

To see how ridiculous such a judgment is, imagine assessing Newton’s Principia by aogebraic contemporary knowledge in physics. So simply put together but so thorough too. This fact should not obscure but rather emphasize the tremendous value of this book. Paperbackpages.


Sigmarsson rated it it was ok Jul 31, Every word and position should be studied carefully and repetitively, because each one is deliberate and important. From bitter personal experience, it is too easy to have a stack alvebraic unread chess books or chess books for which one has only skimmed a chapter or two.

Is it possible to share the algebraic edition? In terms of distillation of fundamental principles, this is the best book on chess I’ve ever read. It explains first principles such as good openings, controlling the center, attacking and cutting off pieces and good endgame strategies.

My rating currently is so low, it’s hard to get games against anyone. Do not post NSFW material. Submit a new text post.

Chess Fundamentals (Capablanca)

In descriptive notation, Q- B 6 K- Q 5. If you post your own games, include your own annotations. I watched a friend of mine giving lessons using this book, the audience could hardly follow.

This can best be done by learning how to accomplish quickly some of the simple mates. Obtaining a passed pawn A good book for beginner and intermediate players. Relinquishing the initiative It notably differs from the verbosity of the commentaries found in today’s chess magazines like “New in Chess” where the annotators flood the reader with a multitude of secondary lines.

Chess Fundamentals by José Raúl Capablanca

Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want algebrac read. Be the first to ask a question about Chess Fundamentals, Revised. If you’re new to the game and want to get a course on the fundamentals of playing good chess, then fundamentxls it is. Aug 25, Eduard Barbu rated it it was amazing.


This is where the tactics problems are beyond mate in one, or spotting a hanging queen. Dec 12, Andrew rated it it was amazing Shelves: Covers the necessary topics to give a beginner a solid foundation on which to build.

The version I’m using is in the public domain, but I don’t know if the algebraic one is too.

Chess Fundamentals by José Raúl Capablanca – Free Ebook

This book is an important window into the mind of a World Chess Champion and one of few chess players in the conversation as greatest of all time. Want to Read saving…. He comprehensively covers all of the important points for a new chess player to algegraic without going into too much depth.

The principle is to drive the opposing King to the last line on any side of the board. Capablanca even makes a gesture of modesty by graciously including examples from games he lost which were very few. Have the rules for check somehow changed since he wrote?

So far, two pages in, I’m finding that it makes sense. Refresh and try again.

Author: admin